Main Page

From Q-ENCY
Revision as of 01:04, 25 May 2014 by CHRIS Admin (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


HELP| MEDIA-WIKI HELP
STATISTICS | ACTIVE USERS | COMMUNITY PORTAL | CURRENT EVENTS
RECENT CHANGES | ALL PAGES | SPECIAL PAGES | EXPORT | IMPORT
TEMPLATES | CATEGORIES

Q-ENCY

the Encyclopedia of Quantavolution


Q-CORE ARTICLES

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Q-ARTICLESQ-SEARCH-TERMS


INTRODUCTION TO QUANTAVOLUTION
by Alfred De Grazia

Quantavolution theory maintains that the world from its beginnings, including the world of life and humanity, has changed largely by quantum leaps, rather than by tiny increments over great stretches of time. It may be well to warn promptly against claiming any relationship to quantum field theory in physics, although dire consequences to gravitation concepts may inhere, because of the seeming all-sufficiency of new electromagnetic theory. Such a global change of perspective requires a search for new evidence, a reformulation of old evidence, a reconsideration of anomalies, changes in meanings of words and phrases, explorations of etymologies of words and concepts, and a reexamination of assumptions, often when they are so accepted as to be trite and so trite as to be ignored -- removed, indeed, from our very cognitive structures.

Charles Darwin said in 1869 in the "Origin of Species" that "anyone whose disposition leads him to attach more weight to unexplained difficulties than to the explanation of a certain number of facts will certainly reject my theory." For a long time it seemed unwise to weigh too heavily the anomalies. Now the time has arrived when "unexplained difficulties" have become indeed too many for the Darwinian model of gradual incre-mental Evolution by natural selection to support. It should be replaced by a theory of Quantavolution. Or, at least, it should be placed up against a contrasting model.

For example, there is an immense idea that persists in the literature to the effect that the Moon was torn from the Earth; this story is told not only by scientists such as George Darwin and George Fisher but also by myths of various cultures. Invariably, if a discussion of the matter is allowed at all, the posited event is positioned in time billions of years ago in the conventionally agreed upon youth of the Earth. Such an event, if it were to be treated seriously in an encyclopedia, would invade hundreds of articles with its causes and effects, changing practically every discipline in ways great and small. This set of works does not treat this idea alone as the true theory; but it considers it properly so serious as to warrant consideration under many headings.

Such theories of "quantavolution" play a part in all discussions as to the origin of the other bodies of the solar system; one needs to explain the considerations that have led serious scholars to ask whether and how the planets originated from the Sun or, if not, then from one or another of themselves (such as Jupiter). Furthermore, the universal belief of ancient cultures and legends, that the gods were born, and were members of the same family, would begin to stir our interest.

In many cultures, there is said to have been an original chaos or world vapor and a catastrophic event from which the father of the gods was born and from him (or her) was born the succession of gods. Why "born" instead of having always been in existence? It is not enough to say that these phrases are only analogies with the birth of animals in nature, or only fairy tales based on the analogies. Why should this be? Many analogies cover realities: might this be such a case? When one says, "Babies are born like puppies," one certainly is not denying that babies are born. And why were all of these gods identified, if of any importance, with the planets and other sky bodies?. Most, if not all, cultures, have insisted that the planets and other sky bodies are divinities. Does this not lend support to the hypothesis of a true succession of birth throes in the heavens? Would this be evidence of a marvellous early philosophical synthesis connecting the birth of the cosmos to that of the members of an earthly family? No matter if the alarming thought should arise: the members of the solar system arose somehow from one another in a series of catastrophes that somehow early humankind had some knowledge or theory about. This is the kind of reasoning that unsettles many scientists and ordinary people who are content to rest with their ordinary perspectives on the universe; it is a "whistle-blower" on the prevailing paradigm of the sciences and the humanities, calling back the play to the line of scrimmage.

The catastrophes responsible for the development of the theory of quantavolution were immensely greater than these, to be sure, but the elemental forces at work, the chemistry, the electricity, the psychic reactions are typical and homologous. As with a host of experiences of the past and present, the individual person must learn about catastrophes of the world -- past, present, and future -- from the testimony of the rocks, the skies, the fossils, the carvings, the ruins, and then from recorded history and logical thought.

The theory of Quantavolution deals with the behavior of substances of the real world so far as one can sense them. It proposes that change in nature and life occur largely as the result of catastrophic events; the events originate in the skies, which contain forces that are immeasurably greater than any in man or Earth and that are especially electrical. There are numerous "catastrophists" who have contributed to Q.. It is vital to appreciate that in Quantavolution, the word "catastrophe" loses its completely bad connotation; for what the world is today is an effect of catastrophe or, better, of Quantavolution, whose goodness and badness are intertwined and to be judged by the philosophy of good and bad consequences.

The underlying philosophy of Quantavolution inclines toward a phenomenological instrumentalism. It regards a "truth" as a fitting and useful part of a system of such truths that constitute. as a whole a possible tolerable outlook upon existence. The terms pragmatism, logical positivism, and operationism come to mind when reaching out for related perspectives. As with catastrophists, many philosophers might be cited. Among them would be Plato, Ockham, Bruno, Locke, Berkeley, Vico, Husserl, Freud, Dewey, Mead, Wittgenstein, and Bridgman.

The day may not be far off when a new philosopher will draw upon the applicable contributions of such thinkers and the fast-growing body of quantavolutionary literature to produce a new philosophy of science.

THE SCOPE OF QUANTAVOLUTION

Scores of scientific and humanistic fields have evolved. Actually every field of knowledge has standing behind it one or more fields of science, and therefore may be considered as a field of applied science, as for instance, architecture or fictional romances. One way of comprehending the extended meaning of general theory of Quantavolution is to browse amidst the list of entries that are contemplated for the Encyclopedia of Quantavolution and Catastrophe. These number several thousands and another thousand will probably be added before the first edition is finished. It will be recalled that the criteria for including an entry in the Encyclopedia is that at least prima facie the entry directly or indirectly affects the theory of Quantavolution. Thus, the abundance of gods carried in the work would be expected if one considers that every known god is connected directly or indirectly with global Quantavolution. Every physical law of science is involved. Most concepts of biology and genetics are relevent. Every part of solar system astronomy enters the work, so, too, numerous stars. By small stretch of the imagination, every scientific and humanistic discipline has many concerns to take from and give to the Quantavolutionary paradigm. To take a seemingly removed case, political science, in both its historical and contemporary materials, must consider many aspects of Quantavolution -- legends, distortions of history, movements generated by the belief in the immediacy of catastrophe, the behavior of not only politicians but also seemingly far-removed scientists who are consciously and unconsciously influenced by catastrophic ideas in their beliefs and by power manipulations in their collectivities. Many entries, it must be said, are built into the Encyclopedia on a need to understand what conventional science is saying and on a suspicion that there must be some Quantavolutionary content to the thing or idea if it were to be more extensively pursued. Excluded from the entry are thousands, and then millions, of things and persons and events, such as are found in general encyclopedias and library catalogs. After all, even a football player might conceivably be included as an entry on the ground that the origin of the game lay in the most ancient religious practices wherein the ball and the players stood for celestial gods and other divine events long remembered. Thus one stands on the brink of declaring that all events are subject to the core events of Quantavolution.

External Links

Wiki Links